See? NY Times really IS a commie rag!

On December 16th 2005, when the New York Times published its expose of the NSA wiretapping, editor Bill Keller claimed his paper had delayed the story for a year. But it turns out the NYT started debating whether to publish the expose weeks before the November 2004 presidential elections. Of course, liberals are asking why the Times decided to wait until after the elections to write on the Bush administration's secret domestic surveillance program. And they're asking why Keller would lie about how long the Times had delayed the publication. Keller's response is clear and understandable: "It was probably inelegant wording...I don't know what was in my head at the time."

What is "inelegant" is the wording of the expose published in the Jew York Times. What is really "inelegant" is publishing a piece critical of the commander–in-chief who was forced to spy on us so he could keep us safe and free. And what is really, really “inelegant” is apologizing for not publishing a story like this before the election. And what is really, really, really "inelegant" is apologizing for lying about sitting on a story until after the elections.

So I ask you, Bill Keller: "What is your head now?" Oh yeah, I already now: a bunch of empty space and a bunch of liberal, freedom-hating baloney. Only someone as deaf, dumb and blind as your ancestor would publish such a dangerous, hateful, and anti-American piece of trash.