3 Open letters in support of H.R. 4437

Politics makes strange bedfellows, sometimes literally, and sometimes figuratively. We’re all charmed by the way Republican spin doctor Mary Matalin and Democrat Spin Doctor James Carville have overcome their ideological differences through pure unadulterated sexual chemistry. Let’s be honest, people, who among us could resist her beady eyes, and almost invisible lips, and his smooth cranium and teasingly tinted glasses. We were all moved by the lovers’ spat between Teddy Kennedy and Arlen Spector we were treated to during the Alito trial, when the two opposing senators argued over letters sent, unanswered, and/ or lost, and visits to the White House gym locker room. So it comes as no surprise that H.R. 4437: Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005, has united a seemingly incompatible army of opposition, which includes the usually sensible President Bush, much of the communist leaning clergy, and the always shrill immigrants’ rights community. HR 4437 was passed by the House. But it still needs to pass the Senate. I have broken down the argument for HR4437 into three parts. Each part is specifically tailored to one of the members of what I like to call the “coalition of the unwilling.” And by unwilling I mean, those unwilling to save America.

President Bush: fight the war on terror

Dear President Bush,
First of all, I know and admire the fact that you are a man of action, not a man of words, who prefers clearing brush to reading. So I hope this letter reaches you, or at least that a summary of the letter reaches you in the form of a PDB (presidential Daily briefing.) I sincerely hope this letter isn’t brushed aside as a “historical document”. I also know you are a man who takes national security seriously. Which is why you must support this “anti-terrorism” bill. Of course not all Mexicans are bad
people. And they do make great food. But they have historically posed a threat to our national security. They have committed acts of violence and acts of terror throughout history. I know I don’t need to remind you of the horrible events of 4/25/1846, when Mexicans attacked U.S. troupes south of the Texas border, starting America’s first war on terror, also known as the Mexican American War. Or the perpetual anti-American Montezuma’s revenge campaign that Mexico continues to launch against our values and our bowels. We can’t just sit back while Mexican aliens plot their next attack in the U.S. What will it take to convince you to take this threat seriously, Mr. President? I fear that by the time you realize the gravity of the situation it will be too late. A group of undocumented and exploited Mexican gardeners will have already driven their lawnmowers into the pentagon.

Love,
Katie





Clergy: What would Jesus Do?
Dear Clergy,
As you know this bill makes it a crime for any social services workers (social workers, advocates, Clergy) to provide services, shelter, or transportation to illegal aliens. Thank G_d!

I ask you, what would Jesus do? There is no evidence whatsoever that Jesus would have supported an amnesty policy for immigrants. The New Testament shows Jesus fraternizing with prostitutes, dining with sinners, healing lepers. If Jesus wanted to show us that immigration was a good thing, wouldn’t he have cured an immigrant? Wouldn’t he have hired an immigrant to clean his feet? Wouldn’t he have broken tortilla with an immigrant family? One could argue that Jesus himself was an immigrant, wandering from Jerusalem, to Galilee, to Nazareth, to Bethlehem. But Jesus was special. He had certain rights that immigrants don’t. When I meet an immigrant who can walk on water, then I’ll be convinced he deserves entry into our great country. It will also make it much easier for him to enter the country, because he won’t have to swim.

So clergy members, when an immigrant arrives on your doorstep, ask yourself WWJD. Do the Christian thing: turn him away, and spread the gospel to the INS. Besides you’re actually helping the immigrant. We all know that it’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of the needle than it is for a rich man to go through the gates of heaven. If we deport the immigrants, they’ll have no chance of upward mobility, it will be impossible for them to escape poverty and become middle class, let alone rich. And only then will they have a chance to get into heaven. So really, by deporting an immigrant, you’re giving him the greatest gift possible: salvation.

Love,
Katie


Everyone else opposed to HR (Immigrant activists and communists and liberals and gays and Jews): Don’t be hypocrites

Dear deviants,
I know you all love to travel to Mexico, to site see, to take language immersion classes, to celebrate the solstice, work with the Zapatistas in Chiapas etc. You leave the United States and go to Mexico because it’s fun, right? Well, why shouldn’t Mexicans be allowed/ forced to leave the United States too? Why shouldn’t they be allowed/ forced to go to Mexico for some r and r? Besides, would you be happy if all the Mexicans came here? No Mexicans would be there to teach you Spanish. No indigenous communities would be struggling for self determination. In other words, you’d have no excuse to visit Mexico. Your vacation plans would be ruined. So don’t be a hypocrite. You know you like being in Mexico and so should the Mexicans. And you know you wouldn’t like Mexico if there weren’t any Mexicans there.

Sincerely,
Katherine Rose Halper

Russ Feingold: one crazy Jew!

Russ Feingold: You’re insane. Or, as your people would say, you're "mashugga"



Russ Feingold’s resolution to censure our President for a little friendly domestic spying reveals once again, that this Wisconsin senator is way out of touch with mainstream America. He’s even too left for the radical Left wing Communist, I mean Democrat Party. The only people who are behind this crazy Jew’s call for censure are fellow nuts Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Tom Harkin of Iowa, and Barbara Boxer of California. Well, Patrick Leahy is so crazy and off kilter,
he even prompted the always charming and civil vice-president to tell him to "f#$& off." If you need more evidence that Feingold’s call is nothing more than Pinko propaganda, look who else is supporting censure: John Dean! The bleeding heart liberal/ former Nixon council, who defended Nixon during the Watergate hearings! Dean testified
before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Bush should indeed be censured because "the president needs to be reminded that separation of powers does not mean an isolation of powers.” As if this cast of commie characters isn’t impressive enough, let’s add one more to the mix: Bruce Fein, the conservative legal scholar who worked under Reagan. He testified that Bush’s interpretation of the law "is not just wrong, but preposterous.”

If only Karl Marx were alive today. I’m sure he’d be supporting the resolution of his co-member of the tribe too! Crazy lefties of the world, Unite! You have nothing to lose but your votes!

Reading + Math - foreign language - art - history = No Child Left Behind = A better America

The other day I read an article in the Communist newspaper The New York Times, entitled "Schools Cut Back Subjects to Push Reading and Math." Thanks to the President's "No Child Left Behind Act," and its emphasis on testing and accountability in certain subjects, several schools are reducing or eliminating the amount of class time spent on subjects besides reading and math. Since this child friendly bill punishes schools if their students "fall behind" in math and reading, what's the point of teaching superfluous and irrelevant subjects like science, history, foreign languages, or art? But what do those frilly courses have to do with education? As long as America's children now how to read and how to multiply, they're set, and America is set.

+ If you know your history, you'll know the old truism: "Those who cannot learn from mathematics and reading are doomed to repeat them." So true.

+ Even singer Sam Cooke was for No Child Left behind. In his pro-No Child Left Behind manifesto entitled "Wonderful World" Cooke said: Don't know much about history/ don't know much biology/ don't know about a science book/ not know much about the French I took/ But I do know that I love you/ And I know that if you loved me too/ What a onderful world this would be. He didn't need to know science, foreign languages, or history to know he was in love, and to know what a wonderful world this could be. But if he hadn't known how to read or add, you can bet he could never have even written that song, or figured out how much his record cost. If Sam were here today, he'd be advocating No Child Left Behind, and he'd be singing against wasting class time on art, history, science, and perhaps, worst of all, music.


Some students complain about learning nothing but math and reading and claim it's counterproductive. One bratty cry baby eighth greater said:

"I hate having two math classes in a row. Two hours of math is too much. I can't concentrate that long."

This student takes two math classes back to back, each morning. And he still managed to fail one of them. So we can't really take what he says seriously, can we? For the most part, kids are loving studying nothing but math and reading. Don't listen to me. Listen to the vice-principal at King Junior High, located in a poor neighborhood in Sacramento, which has narrowed its curriculum: "Most students are not complaining about being miserable." This vice president is obviously "down" and in touch with her student population. She even knows how they speak. She herself is fluent in street: "I've only had about two students come to my office and say: 'What in the world? I'm just taking two courses?' " So in the words of our children: "What in the World" are the critics of No Child Left behind smoking?